The Supreme Court’s ruling hints at a gradual elevation of TikTok to the status of historical relic, as if it’s being consigned to the annals of museums. On one hand, the judges express concerns about the bill potentially violating the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment, yet on the other, they seem more focused on the issue of ownership, which lies with the Chinese government. Such a stance suggests a deeper respect for information security over the freedom of speech. And Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s concerns seem particularly forward-thinking, as he worries about future agents potentially falling into trouble due to today’s information.
Read from: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/us/politics/supreme-court-tiktok-ban-law.html